Gender: Female
Meets With: Men
Nationality: British
Orientation: Straight
Met on
£80 30m
Not far from St George Roundabout towards Lidl • Incall • Free parking
Agreed £80 for 30 mins cum twice.
Interior not the best but typical abode for the location.
Amy is a Thai lady mid to late 30s, cubby and nice tits. Not the best looking but shagable.
Took the papers from me and told to undress while she safely stashed the cash. Amy returned and put on some random, mellow music. I told her to lie on the bed first so I could taste her pussy, I like having this control and pleasuring the WGs first. Around ten mins of tasting her twat making her wet I ask to go in. On with the rubber I proceeded to smash her wet fanny. Squirt one completed. *to note she doesn’t like fingers in her hole which put me off slightly as like sticking a finger or two in there, her reply was “I don’t like that”. A brief rest of which I asked Amy to massage me To get me hard again. After a fairly average massage she rolled me over and proceeded to tug me off using her tits for extra sensitivity, wasn’t long before squirt number two was dripping down her wrist.
Overall not a bad punt. Would I return? Maybe.
30m
just down from the Lawrence Hill train station • Incall
Photos inaccurate
Do not recommend
Would repeat
extremely quick - asked if she was available and she sent back pretty much straight away asking what time, I said thirty minutes and she sent through the location (just down from the Lawrence Hill train station), so all good there. I asked for a short visit of 30 minutes.
general crappy massage you only put up with because it's how these visits generally go - 5 - 10 minute massage, then 20 minutes of sex if you can, but I'm sure you can ask to skip. I guess it wasn't the worst thing in the world, but it definitely wasn't arousing.
plump with a square head, not really what I would define as attractive
Not sure if these workers rotate, but she was plump with a square head, not really what I would define as attractive but cheap is cheap. I will say that you would only really be seeing this worker if you're looking for a cheap place to empty yourself - I'm not a big talker and never want to get too attached to them unless there's something to them which draws me.
whilst it left a lot to be desired, and this worker is not a looker by any definition, I can't fault the cheap price for sex and maybe want to check it out again in a few months time in case they rotate between other workers. High hopes, but worst case scenario it will be another session in doggy where I can let my imagination full in the gaps to drain my balls.
Is £70 cheap for 30 mins sex? I’d say this price could get you at least 80 percent of WG’s in Bristol?
Cheers for the review, although this sounds more like a negative than a neutral. I had a terrible punt with her a few years back.
Basically, she is a fat, ugly munter and looks nothing like her pictures. I could not even get a hard-on because she was so unattractive. I would not even fuck her if it was for free.
At £70/30min she is not even cheap. For the same money you can punt an attractive WG at Diamonds massage parlour in Bristol. There is also a WG called Scottishsacha in Bristol who only charges £50/30min.
I remember your review well Victor, as I had my eye on her profile being based out of Bristol for work at the time. Avoided her then, she seemed to be one of a small group of Thais who were being dishonest in their profiles, or just plain nuts.
Anna_Thai is another bait and switch artist: I reviewed her here and she now has a totally different set of photos to the ones she had when I had my run-in with her over her lying about her location. I'd also strongly doubt if her current set of photos are of her either.
👋
I'm happy to help, Joninbristol. Punters should help each other by sharing our experiences.
Ab-solutely ! 👋
Met on
£60 23m
Small house in the Lawrence hill area of Bristol. A side street off Church road near the train station. • Incall
Photos inaccurate
Do not recommend
OK, but her english is average. We agreed to GFE. I called to receive the house number, 5min before the meet.
Small house in the Lawrence hill area of Bristol. A side street off Church road near the train station. The house was completely blacked out with no light.
She was a fat ugly munter and looked nothing like her pictures on the website.
After knocking, the door was opened and she was hiding behind the door. The house was completely blacked out with no light. I could not see her in the dark when the door was closed. I had stepped in from bright sunlight outside into complete darkness inside. Her voice in the darkness asked for payment, which I gave and was then asked to take a shower which I also did. I then fumbled and stumbled my way back through the dark corridor to the darkened bedroom and was asked to lie face down for a massage. I still could not see her. The massage was very poor. After 7/8 minutes I turned face up. My eyes had become accustomed to the dark and when I saw her my heart sank. She was a fat ugly munter and looked nothing like her pictures on the website. I tried to make the best of it and fuck her missionary style but when my face came near to hers she jerked away (even though we had agreed GFE). By now my little soldier would not stand to attention whatever I did, so I asked for half of my money back stating she was not the person on the website picture. She declined to return my money. We tried to fuck in missionary again but I couldn't get a hard on and decided to leave. I was there for about 23 minutes.
The website pictures are completely misleading and she will agree to anything just to get the business. The only positive is that she was polite when refusing to return half my money. Would I return - NO, even it was for free
Previous review suggests this may be a profile covering a rotation of girls, making it hit or miss who you see.
Yes, I read these reviews 1 week before the meet and hoped that she was a hidden gem as her profile is brief with zero reviews.
When I told her, she was not the same person as in the pictures she said to 'look at her tits'. These were indeed the same but otherwise
she was unrecognizable. This explains the blacked out house and hiding behind the door.
Had the profile on my HL.
£60 30m
a very quiet street just off a main road • Incall • Parking available
Accurate photos
Recommend
Would repeat
all done via text but quickly replied each time.
a house down a very quiet street with parking just off a main road. Was private enough. I think it is a house share but didn’t see or hear anyone else.
Thai women, actually the same as in the photos. Late 30s I’d say. In great shape and very friendly abd smiley.
We both stripped off and she got me to lie face down while she gave me a slow deep massage which felt great. I’m not usually in to massage but really enjoyed it. She then asked if I wanted to lick her pussy, I obliged and she really seemed to enjoy it and got very wet. Protection on then in to covered 69 followed by missionary until I popped. Was offered a shower and friendly talk. Was in for just over 30 mins and didn’t notice any clock watching.
I will see again as I’d like to fuck in more positions and the massage has left me wanting more. Great value at £60 for 30 mins as it’s hard to find anything under £80 these days .
If the map is accurate, close to City Centre, i.e. just off A420 (Church Road), near Lawrence Hill station. Parking available in Lidl next to station.
Yes, that’s where it is.
I'm sure I've seen this profile in Bournemouth,but due to lack of pics at the time ,I didn't follow it up.
Shame as she looks exactly my thing.
Profile was in Bournemouth recently, I seen it. But next day moved on.
30m
road off Castle Lane • Incall
Photos inaccurate
Do not recommend
Excellent comms and English and responded swiftly to texts.
Working from a private house in a road off Castle Lane. Nice clean gaff comfy bed and warm.
Not the Girl in the profile photos. Still a good looking woman with lovely boobs but much plumper than the one advertised on the website.
Both stripped off and got on the bed. This is when I discovered that 'Amy' was super sensitive on some of her body, boobs especially and her feet. This was a bit of a downer as I'm a boob Man and it was difficult to get any decent fondling of them done as she'd squirm away and giggle / flinch. Was quite happy with being fingered and the rest of her body fondled though. Nice oral but with a johnny on. FS was offered which surprised me as it's not on her 'likes' list. This I declined but with hindsight I should have gone for as there might have been a better chance of boob play? Had a bit of a massage which was ok but she's def not a trained masseuse. Finished me off with a nice handjob and then did a good clean up session.
So all in all a pleasant enough half hour but I wouldn't visit again, well not if this particular young Lady was working. It left me wanting more so I decided to go into Boscombe to visit my regular rub n tug joint where I knew my favourite Oriental was working as I'd seen her the week before. Review on that visit to follow later 😊 .
Full link
> Cupid Stuntz on September 03, 2017, 03:12:22 pm:
> Not the Girl in the profile photos. Still a good looking woman with lovely boobs
> but much plumper than the one advertised here.
So this was a B&S
> The_Don on September 03, 2017, 07:22:58 pm:
> Full linkSo this was a B&S
Thought the link didn't work at first and you'd corrected it. They both go to the same profile hence only posting one of them. Should I have posted both?
Heh, B&S had to look that up, assumed it was something like S&M, wrong! Yes it was, fairly common down here especially with the Oriental houses / parlours where there's a fast weekly turnover of Girls. Had it happen a few times. As long as the switch is fit it doesn't really bother me. If she's a munter then it's a case of no thanks and about turn 😱 .
> The_Don on September 03, 2017, 09:53:04 pm:
> Thanks for sharing via this reviewIMOyes(both, please) as each account has
> unique numerical, ID number (that doesn't change).If the account manager
> chooses to, the named part of the I'D, can be edited.Currently, with the coding
> that admin has put in to place, on the forums. The numerical I'D, links to any
> known reviews here, under that I'D. When it's posted here (see below this
> post).The named part of the I'D, may also be searched here, and has it uses
> (IMO). See this post, as an...
Hi. Read, understood and logged. I had no idea both links were so important. Bit of a newbie on here and on a steep learning curve! Thanks for taking the time to explain. Cheers 😊 .
In view of B & S surely a neutral....if not a negative. 👎
The BS thing is pretty common in the B'mth area with the places I frequent so is semi expected with the way the bosses move and rotate the girls around different locations. In this case there was no choice of Ladies as there is in most places. You appear to be down this way so have probably experienced it too? Had she been fugly or given a crap service then yes a neutral or negative would have applied. However all was ok apart from it being a different Girl therefore I gave a positive.
If admin agree and think a positive is incorrect then please downgrade my experience accordingly.
It's down to the OP as it's his, punt, review and rating.
The reader, should take note, that it was B&S.
I've had B&S that worked out positive and negative me.
Location - Bristol
I had the exact opposite experience with this WG a while back. Here's the link to the negative review
Essentially, I found her to be a fat, ugly and smelly munter who looked nothing like her pictures. I couldn't even get a hard-on after seeing her.
"Location: Not far from St George Roundabout towards Lidl"
Nope, No such thing
It's Lawrence Hill roundabout.
I'm not sure "Amy" exists.
She also posts as "Arisa" on Gumtree, Vivastreet & Friday-ad using the name of Amy, Arisa, Jenny & others.
I believe the person you'll see changes weekly.