Kim_KK

I saw her early December and OWO was on offer. It’s why I go see her as her BJs and the CIM are fab. If that’s no longer on the menu, she’s off my hotlist.

On a side note, she doesn’t do anal with me anymore. She did at one point but politely refuses when I ask. I don’t force the issue as I get it probably isn’t that comfortable having a cock up your arse. But never had an issue with the OWO (or lack thereof).

She's normally on when her flat mate is but I've noticed she is missing quite a bit lately.

She goes back to Romania for a few weeks every year I think. She was off for a few weeks at exactly the same time last year. I text Nicole asking when she’d be back and got a really arsey reply! So I just left it and waited for the green light to reappear.

I take it she has moved out of that tower block then?

And still sharing with Nicky?

A tower block (especially the one she was in) is hard to mistake for anything else so if the OP is saying he wouldn’t call it a tower block it’s got to be that she’s moved. Plus 15 mins walk from new street when realistically it’s a 5/10 mins tops walk to the tower block she was at (unless you end up walking out the palisades ramp way and have to walk all the way round)

Anal, OWO and CIM all included for £60 and you give a neutral, don't want a lot for your money do you?

You are correct, the other girl is...

Yeh I had the same experience but I only went for the anal which I just about managed to get hard enough for but I couldn’t cum. She was not interested so neither was I also I couldn’t find her attractive at all plus she was really hairy. Not pussy hairy but dark hair all over hairy which I found off putting! The only positive I could find was her arse was a nice shape and her blow job was okay but she was constantly stopping and wet wiping like she’d got ocd A negative from me also

Cheers. Probably saved me £60 as can’t stand a gut even if there’s some cim on offer, would rather pay more for a slim girl with perky little tits

Thanks for the review i was considering seeing her a while ago but i didn't as i thought her pictures weren't recent so I'm glad i didn't see her

I love how her profile starts with 'ANAL'

Shame about that venue as it's a major deterrent as to why I haven't been back. Maybe if we all stop going she'll get the message and get somewhere better.

Been many times. Never had any of these problems. Hope I'm not posting too soon. Next time I go I'll get a parking ticket, be quizzed by the door staff, no timely messages and end up walking. Hope not.

Am I reading this right? You tried to get into the block BEFORE getting the flat number? If so, I’m not surprised the concierge/security/whoever challenged you! I’ve never had a single issue getting in but have always waited for the flat number before calling through.

Did you have any trouble with the parking meters. Two of them have taken my money without giving me a ticket in recent times.
BTW thanks for the review, and I agree with everything you wrote. My occasional experiences with Kim are the same as yours.

The fee would show up somewhere that I may need to explain. Cash is king.

Your lucky, when I saw her she refused anal because of size, im average length with some girth, but nothing crazy. Maybe she's more comfortable with it now, would love to see her again if she offered anal to me as her booty was something special from behind as I remember.

Sorry forgot to mention in the review: found Kim to be a 'tad bit' hairy too. Wasn't fun touching her 'bodily stubble' during the booking lol. 🤮

I've offered you some advice about repeat reviews, take it or not.

Site rules regarding repeat reviews

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

This is only advice just as Gingernuts has already pointed out. But past 3 reviews in succesion have been of the same WG. You dont need to post a review of a WG every time you see her otherwise the forum would be filled of repeat punter reviews and just clog up the boards. Can you imagine if we all did what your doing? Yeah, we may all have hundreds of reviews to our names but the site would be a total mess. If you want to review her every time then i would say leave her reviews instead. Im sure she would love that.

And just to clarify i do feel 3 reviews on the trot of the same WG is touting. It can be seen as an atempt to increase the WGS review count on the site, as well as push business towards her.

I always understood it as a repeat review of a WG should contain new and useful info like a rating change, bad attitude or something of that nature. But also keeping in mind if that same info would be better mentioned in a new thread on the regional discussion board.

This is all friendly advice so take it or leave it, your call.

Just accept the rules and move on. Its so easy 🤷

Great review mate  😂 . I have been in that same apartment i think, when i saw her mate, many moons ago, who goes by the very sexy name of N.N.N., (or just "N" to her friends). Sounds like you had more fun than me though  😁

Good review mate and she seems vfm

Very entertaining thanks 👍